請在60秒內，通過迅速掃描，把可能會出題的地方在原文中劃出來。開始!

　　[2000.1.(47)(50)]

　　Questions 47-50. Listen to the beginning of a lecture given by a history professor. Good morning, class. Before we begin today, I would like to address an issue that one of you reminded me of after the last lecture. As you may recall, last time I mentioned that Robert E. Pierre was the first person to reach the North Pole. What I neglected to mention was the controversy around Pierres pioneering accomplishment. In 1910, a committee of the national geographical society examined Comeydore Pierres claim to have reached the North Pole on April 6th 1909 and found no reason to doubt him. This judgment was actually confirmed by a committee of the US congress in 1911. Nevertheless, Pierres claim was surrounded by controversy. This was largely due to the competing claim of Doctor Frederic Cook who told the world he had reached the Pole a four-year earlier. Over the decades Pierre was given the benefit of the doubt, but critics persisted in raising questions about his navigation and the distances he claimed to have covered. So the Navigation Foundation spent an additional 12 months of exhaustive examination of documents relating to Pierres polar expedition. The documents supported Pierres claims about the distances he covered. After also conducting an extensive computer analysis of photos taken by Pierre at the pole, they concluded that Pierre and his companions did in fact reach the near vicinity of the North Pole on April 6th, 1909. OK, today were going to talk about exploration of the opposite end of the world. I assume you all read chapter 3 in our text and are now familiar with the names: Emerson and Scott.

　　OK，下面我把考點用粗體陰影標出?？纯茨銊澋脤?

　　Good morning, class. Before we begin today, I would like to address an issue that one of you reminded me of after the last lecture. (開頭原則) As you may recall, last time I mentioned that Robert E. Pierre was the first person (級別強調原則)to reach the North Pole. What I neglected to mention(含義強調原則) was the controversy around Pierres pioneering accomplishment. In 1910, a committee of the national geographical society examined Comeydore Pierres claim to have reached the North Pole on April 6th 1909 and found no reason to doubt him. This judgment was actually confirmed by a committee of the US congress in 1911. Nevertheless, (轉折原則)Pierres claim was surrounded by controversy. This was largely due to (因果原則)the competing claim of Doctor Frederic Cook who told the world he had reached the Pole a four-year earlier. Over the decades Pierre was given the benefit of the doubt, but (轉折原則)critics persisted in raising questions about his navigation and the distances he claimed to have covered. So (因果原則)the Navigation Foundation spent an additional 12 months of exhaustive examination of documents relating to Pierres polar expedition. The documents supported Pierres claims about the distances he covered. After also conducting an extensive computer analysis of photos taken by Pierre at the pole, they concluded that (結論強調原則)Pierre and his companions did in fact(轉折原則) reach the near vicinity of the North Pole on April 6th, 1909. OK, today were going to talk about exploration of the opposite end of the world. I assume you all read chapter 3 in our text and are now familiar with the names: Emerson and Scott. (尾巴原則)

　　中文參考譯文：

　　早上好。在我們開始之前，我想提一下上節(jié)課后一位同學給我提出的一個問題。(開頭原則)你們可能還記得，上節(jié)課我說過Robert E. Pierre是第一個(級別強調原則)到達北極的人。而我沒提到過(含義強調原則)對Pierre這次歷險成就的爭論。1910年，一個國家地理學會小組考察了宣布Comeydore Pierre在1909年4月6日登上北極點的報告，發(fā)現(xiàn)沒有理由懷疑他的成功。這個決定被美國國會在1911年就核實了。然而，(轉折原則)Pierre的成就卻被疑問包圍著。這是因為(因果原則)Frederic Cook醫(yī)生宣布他比Pierre早4年到達北極點。在以后的年代里Pierre賺了懷疑的便宜，但是(轉折原則)批評家堅持對他所走方向和所走距離提出疑問。所以，(因果原則)領航基金會又用了12個月的難熬時間來考察Pierre的歷險。文件支持了Pierre對路程的主張。在用了大量電腦分析Pierre在北極點拍的照片以后，他們作出結論：(結論強調原則)Pierre和他的伙伴們實際上的確(轉折原則)在1909年4月6日到達了北極點。好，今天我們將要討論對地球另一個極點的探索。我猜你們在讀過書中的第三章以后，一定對Emerson和Scott這兩個名字不陌生了吧?(尾巴原則)

　　請在60秒內，通過迅速掃描，把可能會出題的地方在原文中劃出來。開始!

　　[2000.1.(47)(50)]

　　Questions 47-50. Listen to the beginning of a lecture given by a history professor. Good morning, class. Before we begin today, I would like to address an issue that one of you reminded me of after the last lecture. As you may recall, last time I mentioned that Robert E. Pierre was the first person to reach the North Pole. What I neglected to mention was the controversy around Pierres pioneering accomplishment. In 1910, a committee of the national geographical society examined Comeydore Pierres claim to have reached the North Pole on April 6th 1909 and found no reason to doubt him. This judgment was actually confirmed by a committee of the US congress in 1911. Nevertheless, Pierres claim was surrounded by controversy. This was largely due to the competing claim of Doctor Frederic Cook who told the world he had reached the Pole a four-year earlier. Over the decades Pierre was given the benefit of the doubt, but critics persisted in raising questions about his navigation and the distances he claimed to have covered. So the Navigation Foundation spent an additional 12 months of exhaustive examination of documents relating to Pierres polar expedition. The documents supported Pierres claims about the distances he covered. After also conducting an extensive computer analysis of photos taken by Pierre at the pole, they concluded that Pierre and his companions did in fact reach the near vicinity of the North Pole on April 6th, 1909. OK, today were going to talk about exploration of the opposite end of the world. I assume you all read chapter 3 in our text and are now familiar with the names: Emerson and Scott.

　　OK，下面我把考點用粗體陰影標出?？纯茨銊澋脤?

　　Good morning, class. Before we begin today, I would like to address an issue that one of you reminded me of after the last lecture. (開頭原則) As you may recall, last time I mentioned that Robert E. Pierre was the first person (級別強調原則)to reach the North Pole. What I neglected to mention(含義強調原則) was the controversy around Pierres pioneering accomplishment. In 1910, a committee of the national geographical society examined Comeydore Pierres claim to have reached the North Pole on April 6th 1909 and found no reason to doubt him. This judgment was actually confirmed by a committee of the US congress in 1911. Nevertheless, (轉折原則)Pierres claim was surrounded by controversy. This was largely due to (因果原則)the competing claim of Doctor Frederic Cook who told the world he had reached the Pole a four-year earlier. Over the decades Pierre was given the benefit of the doubt, but (轉折原則)critics persisted in raising questions about his navigation and the distances he claimed to have covered. So (因果原則)the Navigation Foundation spent an additional 12 months of exhaustive examination of documents relating to Pierres polar expedition. The documents supported Pierres claims about the distances he covered. After also conducting an extensive computer analysis of photos taken by Pierre at the pole, they concluded that (結論強調原則)Pierre and his companions did in fact(轉折原則) reach the near vicinity of the North Pole on April 6th, 1909. OK, today were going to talk about exploration of the opposite end of the world. I assume you all read chapter 3 in our text and are now familiar with the names: Emerson and Scott. (尾巴原則)

　　中文參考譯文：

　　早上好。在我們開始之前，我想提一下上節(jié)課后一位同學給我提出的一個問題。(開頭原則)你們可能還記得，上節(jié)課我說過Robert E. Pierre是第一個(級別強調原則)到達北極的人。而我沒提到過(含義強調原則)對Pierre這次歷險成就的爭論。1910年，一個國家地理學會小組考察了宣布Comeydore Pierre在1909年4月6日登上北極點的報告，發(fā)現(xiàn)沒有理由懷疑他的成功。這個決定被美國國會在1911年就核實了。然而，(轉折原則)Pierre的成就卻被疑問包圍著。這是因為(因果原則)Frederic Cook醫(yī)生宣布他比Pierre早4年到達北極點。在以后的年代里Pierre賺了懷疑的便宜，但是(轉折原則)批評家堅持對他所走方向和所走距離提出疑問。所以，(因果原則)領航基金會又用了12個月的難熬時間來考察Pierre的歷險。文件支持了Pierre對路程的主張。在用了大量電腦分析Pierre在北極點拍的照片以后，他們作出結論：(結論強調原則)Pierre和他的伙伴們實際上的確(轉折原則)在1909年4月6日到達了北極點。好，今天我們將要討論對地球另一個極點的探索。我猜你們在讀過書中的第三章以后，一定對Emerson和Scott這兩個名字不陌生了吧?(尾巴原則)