編輯點(diǎn)評(píng)： GRE寫作需要大家積累一定的寫作素材、鍛煉自己的邏輯思維、多多積累一些有用的句子和詞匯，有了這些基礎(chǔ)以后，就需要大家根據(jù)真題來進(jìn)行練習(xí)寫作了。

　　Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem. Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work, the commute now takes closer to 40 minutes, according to the survey just completed. Members of the town council already have suggested more road building to address the problem, but as well as being expensive, the new construction will surely disrupt some of our residential neighborhoods. It would be better to follow the example of the nearby city of Garville. Last year Garville implemented a policy that rewards people who share rides to work, giving them coupons for free gas. Pollution levels in Garville have dropped since the policy was implemented, and people from Garville tell me that commuting times have fallen considerably. There is no reason why a policy like Garville s shouldn t work equally well in Waymarsh.

　　Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

　　中文翻譯：

　　W的交通已經(jīng)成為一個(gè)大問題。盡管3年前一個(gè)全國的交通調(diào)查顯示開車上班族需20分鐘，而最近調(diào)查顯示現(xiàn)在卻要40分鐘。市議會(huì)已經(jīng)建議修筑更多的公路來解決這一問題，但這需要很多錢，同時(shí)工程也給本地百姓帶了一些不便。我們應(yīng)該效仿臨近的G市，去年G市實(shí)施一項(xiàng)政策鼓勵(lì)人們合伙搭車，并給他們免費(fèi)的加油卷。政策實(shí)施后，G的污染減輕了，一些G的人們告訴我在路上的時(shí)間明顯的快了很多。因此，我們W采用相同的政策也一定會(huì)達(dá)到相同的效果。

　　寫一篇回應(yīng)，討論還需要何種具體的證據(jù)才能更好的評(píng)估上面的論證，并解釋這個(gè)證據(jù)是如何強(qiáng)化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。

　　以上就是為大家提供的新版GRE寫作新題庫Argument部分的內(nèi)容，希望大家能夠在練習(xí)中提高自己的寫作水平。

　　編輯點(diǎn)評(píng)： GRE寫作需要大家積累一定的寫作素材、鍛煉自己的邏輯思維、多多積累一些有用的句子和詞匯，有了這些基礎(chǔ)以后，就需要大家根據(jù)真題來進(jìn)行練習(xí)寫作了。

　　Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem. Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work, the commute now takes closer to 40 minutes, according to the survey just completed. Members of the town council already have suggested more road building to address the problem, but as well as being expensive, the new construction will surely disrupt some of our residential neighborhoods. It would be better to follow the example of the nearby city of Garville. Last year Garville implemented a policy that rewards people who share rides to work, giving them coupons for free gas. Pollution levels in Garville have dropped since the policy was implemented, and people from Garville tell me that commuting times have fallen considerably. There is no reason why a policy like Garville s shouldn t work equally well in Waymarsh.

　　Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

　　中文翻譯：

　　W的交通已經(jīng)成為一個(gè)大問題。盡管3年前一個(gè)全國的交通調(diào)查顯示開車上班族需20分鐘，而最近調(diào)查顯示現(xiàn)在卻要40分鐘。市議會(huì)已經(jīng)建議修筑更多的公路來解決這一問題，但這需要很多錢，同時(shí)工程也給本地百姓帶了一些不便。我們應(yīng)該效仿臨近的G市，去年G市實(shí)施一項(xiàng)政策鼓勵(lì)人們合伙搭車，并給他們免費(fèi)的加油卷。政策實(shí)施后，G的污染減輕了，一些G的人們告訴我在路上的時(shí)間明顯的快了很多。因此，我們W采用相同的政策也一定會(huì)達(dá)到相同的效果。

　　寫一篇回應(yīng)，討論還需要何種具體的證據(jù)才能更好的評(píng)估上面的論證，并解釋這個(gè)證據(jù)是如何強(qiáng)化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。

　　以上就是為大家提供的新版GRE寫作新題庫Argument部分的內(nèi)容，希望大家能夠在練習(xí)中提高自己的寫作水平。