2023復習正在如火如荼的進行中，考研專家建議可以按考研題型分別進行重點復習，是考研英語中分值最高的，在線小編特地整理了2023理解模擬試題供大家模擬練習，希望大家認真做題，錯題著重看解析及譯文，經過練習閱讀理解能力必能有所提高。 　　二十二、一位荷蘭藝術家及其作品 　　An overturned bus lies on a rural highway, split open like a disjointed limb. Emergency workers slowly mill about, but the purpose of their activity is not clear. A line of cars stretches into the distance, their occupants gazing indifferently on this putative accident. 　　The images come from Refraction, a video by the Dutch artist Aernout Mik that opens tomorrow at the New Museum of Contemporary Art in Chelsea. The solo exhibition could bring about a new prominence for Mr. Mik, whose work has been shown with increasing frequency in Europe during the last decade but is not widely known in the United States. Nothing in Refraction is quite what it seems. The images are dreamlike, but shot in high-definition video that suggests a newscast gone strangely twisted. The video is about 30 minutes long, with no sound; it runs in a continuous loop and has anything but a narrative arc. It was shot in a single day on a lonely road in rural Romania using participants who received only vague instructions on how to act. 　　The work raises questions about our responses to catastrophe, tragedy and even traffic congestion. Mr. Mik says that collective consciousness is an important theme of his work, and he seems to approach his subjects as a sociologist or entomologist might. Its not about character, he said in an interview, after flying in from Amsterdam for the opening of the exhibition. Its always about the individual in a relatively small, or relatively bigger group, being in its environment. The images hint at contemporary anxieties, but cannot be easily fixed in space or time. 　　Perhaps the most haunting aspect of the video is the view of men dressed in protective white bodysuits, wearing green vests and plucking, with tweezers, at the detritus inside the toppled bus. They appear to be placing the debris into clear plastic sample bags. A possible bioterrorist attack? No other cues provide an answer. Mr. Mik at first intended to make his accident entirely victimless, but at the last moment, he said, he decided to produce shots of a few people who, presumably, were on the bus. Several are wrapped in blue flannel blankets; one woman is in a shiny metallic sheet as an aid worker speaks to her. No one appears traumatized, so the extent and nature of these victims injuries are unknown. Less depressing, but equally memorable, is a moment when a herd of sheep and goats amble from the surrounding fields onto the road. Their origins and destination are unexplained, but the comparison to the human flock is pretty clear. 　　Mr. Mik, who is 42 and based in Amsterdam, has had several dozen solo exhibitions across Europe since 1995, but until this year his work has been displayed in the United States only a handful of times. He resists being called a video artist, however, and prefers to describe the work as a mixture of media. I dont consider it as just video, he said. I sometimes call myself, provocatively, a sculptor, because I really bring the moving image to the space. Its very much a spatial intervention instead of just film projected somewhere. 　　1.The word putative most probably means _____. 　　[A] dreamy [B] strange [C] terrible [D] supposed 　　2.Refraction seems to be the name of _____. 　　[A] a film [B] a performance [C] a sculpture [D] an exhibition 　　3.The themes expressed in Aernout Miks work do Not include _____. 　　[A] disasters and tragedies [B] human unconcern about others [C] group effect [D] overcrowdedness 　　4.Which of the following is true about the work Refraction? 　　[A] It was produced and will be exhibited in Chelsea. [B] All the participants in it were photoed unconsciously. 　　[C] There is no victim in the accident narrated. [D] Animals appear in it and are compared to human flock. 　　5.It is true of Mr. Mik, the artist, that _____. 　　[A] he is increasingly prominent in the United States [B] he studies human group behavior from an artistic perspective 　　[C] he intends to warn viewers against bioterrorist attacks [D] he considers himself a video artist and a sculptor 　　答案：1.D 2.A 3.B 4.D 5.B 　　核心詞匯或超綱詞匯 　　limb肢;翼;大枝 　　putative推定的，假定的;被公認的 　　refraction折光，折射;refract使折射;refractable可折射的;refractive折射的 　　loop圈，環;重復，循環使成圈/環，把東西系在一起 　　arc弧，拱;循弧線行進 　　catastrophe大災難，大禍;catastrophic 　　congestion擁塞，充血;congest 　　entomologist昆蟲學者;entomology昆蟲學 　　pluck采，摘，拔，扯，拉，鼓起 　　tweezers鑷子，小鉗;tweeze以鑷子除去，以鉗子拔除 　　detritus碎石，碎片;堆積物，廢墟 　　debris碎片, 殘骸 　　traumatize使受外傷;使受精神[心理]上創傷;trauma身體上或精神上的創傷 　　provocatively煽動地，挑釁地，引起爭論的;provocate激怒，刺激，惹起 　　全文翻譯 　　一輛公共汽車翻倒在鄉村高速公路上，像脫節的肢體一樣四分五裂。急救人員在毫無目標地打轉，但他們這種活動的目的并不明確。汽車的隊列向遠處延伸，車主們冷漠地盯著這場虛構的事故。 　　這一場景來自于荷蘭藝術家Aernout Mik的錄像作品。該作品將于明天在切爾西的當代藝術新展覽館展示。此次個人展出將會為Mik先生帶來更大的知名度。在過去的十年中，Aernout Mik的作品在歐洲頻繁展出，但是在美國仍不是廣為人知。在Refraction中顯示出的東西和它本來的樣子很不相同。圖象如夢幻一般，卻是用高清晰度的錄像機拍攝的，它顯示了一個極端扭曲的資訊。錄像長約30分鐘，是無聲連續循環播放的，除了敘述的弧度什么也沒有。這次拍攝是在羅馬尼亞一條僻靜的鄉村公路上花了一天時間完成。它的參與者只收到關于如何表演的模糊指導。 　　Aernout Mik的這個作品提出了關于我們人類對災難、悲劇，甚至交通堵塞的反應這樣的問題。Mik先生說集體意識是他作品的一個重要的主題。而他似乎從一個社會學家或昆蟲家的角度看待作品中的人物。為展覽開幕從阿姆斯特丹飛過來后，他在一次采訪中說，那不是關于人物的，它一直是關于處在一個相對較小或大的群體中，即在環境中的個體。圖象暗示了當代的焦慮，但是不能簡單地固定于空間和時間中。 　　錄像中最令人難忘的部分可能是身著白色緊身衣褲，外配綠色馬甲，在翻倒的汽車里用小鉗子夾起碎石的景象。看起來他們好像正在把殘骸放入干凈的樣本塑料袋中。可不可能是生物恐怖主義襲擊?沒有其他線索為此提供答案。起初，Mik先生有意不為本次事故設計受害者，他說，但是在最后一刻，他決定拍攝幾個假定在車上的人。有幾個人被包裹在法蘭絨的毯子中，一位工作助手在對一位身披閃閃發光的金屬床單的女士講話。好像沒有人精神受創，因此這些受害者的傷勢也無從了解。還有一刻沒有那么令人沮喪但是同樣難忘。當時，一群綿羊和山羊步態從容地從周圍的田野向路上走來。誰也沒有解釋它們從哪里來，要去向哪里，但是顯而易見的是他們和人群形成了對比。 　　Mik先生今年42歲，現定居阿姆斯特丹。自1995年以來他已經穿越歐洲舉辦了數十場個人展覽，但是直到今年它的作品在美國才有少數幾次展示。他拒絕被稱作錄像藝術家，而更愿意將自己的作品描述成媒介混合物。他說：我認為它不僅僅是錄像，有時候，我有意稱自己為雕塑家，因為我確實把流動的景象帶到了生活空間。它不是在某個地方的電影，而更像一種空間性的介入。

　　2023復習正在如火如荼的進行中，考研專家建議可以按考研題型分別進行重點復習，是考研英語中分值最高的，在線小編特地整理了2023理解模擬試題供大家模擬練習，希望大家認真做題，錯題著重看解析及譯文，經過練習閱讀理解能力必能有所提高。 　　二十二、一位荷蘭藝術家及其作品 　　An overturned bus lies on a rural highway, split open like a disjointed limb. Emergency workers slowly mill about, but the purpose of their activity is not clear. A line of cars stretches into the distance, their occupants gazing indifferently on this putative accident. 　　The images come from Refraction, a video by the Dutch artist Aernout Mik that opens tomorrow at the New Museum of Contemporary Art in Chelsea. The solo exhibition could bring about a new prominence for Mr. Mik, whose work has been shown with increasing frequency in Europe during the last decade but is not widely known in the United States. Nothing in Refraction is quite what it seems. The images are dreamlike, but shot in high-definition video that suggests a newscast gone strangely twisted. The video is about 30 minutes long, with no sound; it runs in a continuous loop and has anything but a narrative arc. It was shot in a single day on a lonely road in rural Romania using participants who received only vague instructions on how to act. 　　The work raises questions about our responses to catastrophe, tragedy and even traffic congestion. Mr. Mik says that collective consciousness is an important theme of his work, and he seems to approach his subjects as a sociologist or entomologist might. Its not about character, he said in an interview, after flying in from Amsterdam for the opening of the exhibition. Its always about the individual in a relatively small, or relatively bigger group, being in its environment. The images hint at contemporary anxieties, but cannot be easily fixed in space or time. 　　Perhaps the most haunting aspect of the video is the view of men dressed in protective white bodysuits, wearing green vests and plucking, with tweezers, at the detritus inside the toppled bus. They appear to be placing the debris into clear plastic sample bags. A possible bioterrorist attack? No other cues provide an answer. Mr. Mik at first intended to make his accident entirely victimless, but at the last moment, he said, he decided to produce shots of a few people who, presumably, were on the bus. Several are wrapped in blue flannel blankets; one woman is in a shiny metallic sheet as an aid worker speaks to her. No one appears traumatized, so the extent and nature of these victims injuries are unknown. Less depressing, but equally memorable, is a moment when a herd of sheep and goats amble from the surrounding fields onto the road. Their origins and destination are unexplained, but the comparison to the human flock is pretty clear. 　　Mr. Mik, who is 42 and based in Amsterdam, has had several dozen solo exhibitions across Europe since 1995, but until this year his work has been displayed in the United States only a handful of times. He resists being called a video artist, however, and prefers to describe the work as a mixture of media. I dont consider it as just video, he said. I sometimes call myself, provocatively, a sculptor, because I really bring the moving image to the space. Its very much a spatial intervention instead of just film projected somewhere. 　　1.The word putative most probably means _____. 　　[A] dreamy [B] strange [C] terrible [D] supposed 　　2.Refraction seems to be the name of _____. 　　[A] a film [B] a performance [C] a sculpture [D] an exhibition 　　3.The themes expressed in Aernout Miks work do Not include _____. 　　[A] disasters and tragedies [B] human unconcern about others [C] group effect [D] overcrowdedness 　　4.Which of the following is true about the work Refraction? 　　[A] It was produced and will be exhibited in Chelsea. [B] All the participants in it were photoed unconsciously. 　　[C] There is no victim in the accident narrated. [D] Animals appear in it and are compared to human flock. 　　5.It is true of Mr. Mik, the artist, that _____. 　　[A] he is increasingly prominent in the United States [B] he studies human group behavior from an artistic perspective 　　[C] he intends to warn viewers against bioterrorist attacks [D] he considers himself a video artist and a sculptor 　　答案：1.D 2.A 3.B 4.D 5.B 　　核心詞匯或超綱詞匯 　　limb肢;翼;大枝 　　putative推定的，假定的;被公認的 　　refraction折光，折射;refract使折射;refractable可折射的;refractive折射的 　　loop圈，環;重復，循環使成圈/環，把東西系在一起 　　arc弧，拱;循弧線行進 　　catastrophe大災難，大禍;catastrophic 　　congestion擁塞，充血;congest 　　entomologist昆蟲學者;entomology昆蟲學 　　pluck采，摘，拔，扯，拉，鼓起 　　tweezers鑷子，小鉗;tweeze以鑷子除去，以鉗子拔除 　　detritus碎石，碎片;堆積物，廢墟 　　debris碎片, 殘骸 　　traumatize使受外傷;使受精神[心理]上創傷;trauma身體上或精神上的創傷 　　provocatively煽動地，挑釁地，引起爭論的;provocate激怒，刺激，惹起 　　全文翻譯 　　一輛公共汽車翻倒在鄉村高速公路上，像脫節的肢體一樣四分五裂。急救人員在毫無目標地打轉，但他們這種活動的目的并不明確。汽車的隊列向遠處延伸，車主們冷漠地盯著這場虛構的事故。 　　這一場景來自于荷蘭藝術家Aernout Mik的錄像作品。該作品將于明天在切爾西的當代藝術新展覽館展示。此次個人展出將會為Mik先生帶來更大的知名度。在過去的十年中，Aernout Mik的作品在歐洲頻繁展出，但是在美國仍不是廣為人知。在Refraction中顯示出的東西和它本來的樣子很不相同。圖象如夢幻一般，卻是用高清晰度的錄像機拍攝的，它顯示了一個極端扭曲的資訊。錄像長約30分鐘，是無聲連續循環播放的，除了敘述的弧度什么也沒有。這次拍攝是在羅馬尼亞一條僻靜的鄉村公路上花了一天時間完成。它的參與者只收到關于如何表演的模糊指導。 　　Aernout Mik的這個作品提出了關于我們人類對災難、悲劇，甚至交通堵塞的反應這樣的問題。Mik先生說集體意識是他作品的一個重要的主題。而他似乎從一個社會學家或昆蟲家的角度看待作品中的人物。為展覽開幕從阿姆斯特丹飛過來后，他在一次采訪中說，那不是關于人物的，它一直是關于處在一個相對較小或大的群體中，即在環境中的個體。圖象暗示了當代的焦慮，但是不能簡單地固定于空間和時間中。 　　錄像中最令人難忘的部分可能是身著白色緊身衣褲，外配綠色馬甲，在翻倒的汽車里用小鉗子夾起碎石的景象。看起來他們好像正在把殘骸放入干凈的樣本塑料袋中。可不可能是生物恐怖主義襲擊?沒有其他線索為此提供答案。起初，Mik先生有意不為本次事故設計受害者，他說，但是在最后一刻，他決定拍攝幾個假定在車上的人。有幾個人被包裹在法蘭絨的毯子中，一位工作助手在對一位身披閃閃發光的金屬床單的女士講話。好像沒有人精神受創，因此這些受害者的傷勢也無從了解。還有一刻沒有那么令人沮喪但是同樣難忘。當時，一群綿羊和山羊步態從容地從周圍的田野向路上走來。誰也沒有解釋它們從哪里來，要去向哪里，但是顯而易見的是他們和人群形成了對比。 　　Mik先生今年42歲，現定居阿姆斯特丹。自1995年以來他已經穿越歐洲舉辦了數十場個人展覽，但是直到今年它的作品在美國才有少數幾次展示。他拒絕被稱作錄像藝術家，而更愿意將自己的作品描述成媒介混合物。他說：我認為它不僅僅是錄像，有時候，我有意稱自己為雕塑家，因為我確實把流動的景象帶到了生活空間。它不是在某個地方的電影，而更像一種空間性的介入。